I came to
Canberra and
the Philosophy
Program at RSSS in February 2007. I'm originally from
Norway,
but I spent the last three years in Melbourne, doing Honours
and then Masters in Philosophy. I wrote my masters thesis at Monash
University.
My main
interest is
philosophy of mind, and particularly phenomenal experience: its role in
motivation, decision-making and cognition in general, and its
metaphysical status. I am also interested in the metaphysics of mind,
and in metaphysics more broadly. Recently I have also become interested in epistemology.
I am a member of Amnesty International, and I write letter in response to their requests for Urgent Action. Here is a blog where you can read those letters. Please consider doing something to defend human rights..
Publications
'Conservation of Energy is Relevant to Physicalism'
— dialectica, Vol. 61(4), 2007, pp. 573 - 582
I argue against Barbara Montero’s claim that Conservation of Energy (CoE) has nothing to do with physicalism. I reject her reconstruction of the argument for physicalism from CoE, and offer instead an alternative reconstruction that better captures the intuitions of those who believe that there is a conflict between interactionist dualism and CoE.
Masters Thesis
In Defence of Interactionism The abstract is available here; the table of contens here. The entire thesis, including front matter and appendices, can be downloaded here (1.8MB). If the full file is too large to be comfortably downloaded on your connection, please ask me to send you the part(s) you are interested in separately.
Work in Progress
‘Dualism
by Degrees’ (with Prof. John Bigelow)
Philosophers often ask one another whether they are monists or
dualists. They very seldom ask to what degree their views are dualist.
We hope that that will change. In place of a strict dichotomy we argue
that the difference between monism and dualism in the philosophy of
mind should be seen as variation along a continuous scale. Where on the
scale a given view belongs is best characterised by estimating how
radical it says that a break from current physical science will have to
be in order for the joint science that then emerges to furnish a likely
candidate for a theory that can account for consciousness, thoughts,
and feelings.
’Interactionism
and Conservation of Energy’
Interactionist dualism claims at least this much: the mind
brings
about some physical events that would not otherwise have occurred. The
position is sometimes summarily dismissed on the grounds that it is
supposed to be obviously at odds with certain well-established
scientific results. I discuss, evaluate, and reject one influential
claim of incompatibility, namely the claim that interactionist dualism
is incompatible with the Conservation of Energy law in physics.